An Honest Grammarly Review by a Bestselling Author

Grammarly Grammar and Spell Check

Features

Runs spell and grammar checks in the background while you work.  Always getting smarter and learns how you write.  Does ninety percent of the work of a professional editor.

User Friendly

Considering how powerful this tool really is, it's astounding at how simple the interface is.  Editing massive documents is three times faster than using the Word tool.  Errors and suggested changes are easy to read.

Price

Most people think that spell and grammar checking should be free.  We are used to them as part of our word processors.  However, this product will save you more than it's price in time-saved alone during the first month.

Summary: As a professional author, I can't afford to let mistakes out the door.  When I first heard that people were paying for a spell check, I thought they were ridiculous.  Once I took Grammarly for a spin, I changed my tune.  I have improved the quality and speed of my writing.  In the first week of use, Grammarly paid for itself ten times over.  I can charge higher rates for projects and release books much faster.

  • Catchings mistakes and protects you from bad reviews
  • Can catch plagiarism and save you from a serious lawsuit
  • Edit documents in minutes instead of hours
  • Improves the overall quality of your writing and catches overused adjectives and metaphors
  • Saves you on editor costs
  • Can only handle documents up to 65 pages
  • Only works online; if you get disconnected from the Internet, you must restart
  • The WordPress integration doesn't always work with complicated themes
  • Occasionally gets caught in a loop and recommends a change and then reversing it over and over again

Free for Basic; $139.95/year for Premium

When I first heard that there was a piece of paid software that simply did a spellcheck, I thought that was ridiculous.  Why would anyone pay for spellcheck or grammar check when every computer comes with that ability for free.  Then I heard that Grammarly will even run a spell check while I write blog posts like this one.  But WordPress already does that.  Who would pay for software that fixes a problem I don't have?  In this Grammarly review, I seek to share that answer.

My English Qualifications

I was a serious nerd in high school, and perfect English was my passion.  I got beat up when I laughed at a jock for mispronouncing a word, and my English teacher would call me to the board to diagram the toughest sentences.  On the PSAT I scored a PERFECT in the English section.  I didn't miss a single question, and in case you're wondering I only missed one question in math.

I was so ahead in high school that I skipped a year in college and graduated at twenty-one.  I went on to many adventures, but my primary profession was teaching English as a foreign language. I  received my first post-graduate certificate from the University of Wales, Swansea.  This educational institution is renowned for its English program.

In my career, I taught English at high schools, universities and major corporations, including Standard and Poor.  I eventually earned a Masters with Merit from King's College in London in English and Applied Linguistics.  King's College is the best school on earth for this advanced English degree.  My dissertation was so excellent that a publishing house contacted me about releasing my writing into the wild.  My dissertation is the first book I published.

With multiple post-graduate qualifications, a published dissertation and a teaching career that began with a perfect score on the PSAT, I couldn't imagine what something like Grammarly could possibly offer me.  My experience makes me uniquely qualified to review Grammarly.

perfect PSAT Grammarly review

Writing Pays My Bills

I make a living from my writing and generate over one million words a year.  I have dozens of Amazon bestsellers under my belt, as well as multiple direct response contracts.  I run several successful blogs, including this one, teaching other people how to become amazing writers.

When you make six-figures from your writing, you take it pretty seriously.  I am very hesitant to add any tools or software to my workflow.  The written word is my living, and like many successful writers, I am set in my ways.

It's important to understand that I make a living from writing and that makes me uniquely qualified to write this comprehensive Grammarly review.

During the pre-release phase for my most recent book launch, I sent out over three hundred review copies.  Every single review was glowing, except for one.  One reviewer was brutal and tore me to shreds.  She compared me to an amateur and suggested that I join a group for wannabe authors to get help with my editing.

It was unbelievable.  It was brutal.  I had to take action.

Taking Grammarly for a Test Drive

taking grammarly for a test drive and review

My first step was to try out and review Grammarly for myself.  I went to the website, signed up for the free version and downloaded the software.  I couldn't find any information online about the difference between the free and paid versions, but don't worry I will explain that below.

Honestly, I was expecting nothing from this software.  I am a pretentious writer after all.  How could I possibly have any spelling or grammar mistakes…and then Grammarly kicked me in the teeth.

After loading in the first chapter of my book, I found dozens of “critical errors” and other mistakes that Grammarly demanded I fix instantly.  I use Scrivener for my primary writing tool, and it has the worst spell check of any software in the world.  It is astoundingly bad.  It's the best word processor I have ever used, but the spell and grammar check is hot garbage backing on the sidewalk on a Summer's day.  It's awful.

I always export my work into Microsoft Word to run their superior spellcheck software.  Before Grammarly saw this chapter, it went through an extensive editing process.  After writing the book, I had an editor go through the entire project. Then I personally did three complete readthroughs and re-edits.  I had hundreds of reviewers scan the book for any mistakes.

I expected Grammarly to find perfection; I was wrong.  This Grammarly review is based on my experience.

My First Grammarly Test

Grammarly Review

This is the original edit of my book before I ever used Grammarly.  It found loads of tiny mistakes and habits that I picked up in the UK.  You may notice that in a series I don't use a comma before the word and.  This is a habit I picked up abroad that really drives Grammarly crazy.

I didn't expect Grammarly to come up with any mistakes.  According to Word and Scrivener, this page was without errors.  Grammarly is in a league all on its own.

What is the Difference Between Free and Paid

Grammarly has several levels of error correction.  The first level is a basic spell check.  This spell check is light years beyond what anyone else is doing but compared to the rest of what Grammarly can do it is pretty simple.

When you use the free version of Grammarly, they do everything in their power to convince you to upgrade to the pro version.  I thought this was silly.  How could the pro version be any better than this?

Grammarly will show you that your page has dozens of “critical errors” but won't reveal them unless you pay.  They were playing upon my paranoia, and I finally bit the bullet and paid for the upgrade.

Grammarly Pricing

With the paid version of Grammarly, you get:

  • Passive Voice Check
  • Repetitive Word Check
  • Plagiarism Check
  • Word Confusion Check
  • Wordiness Check
  • Confusion Check

I never realized how much I use the passive voice in my writing.  It was a real kick in the teeth, but Grammarly doesn't pull any punches.  In the free version, Grammarly catches the mistakes that will affect your grades in high school. If you are turning in reports to your English teacher, the free version is more than enough.

But if you are doing any form of creative writing or want people to pay for your language, then you want the full version.  The paid version makes me a better writer.  It helps me to find better words when I get stuck using the same adjective too often.  My latest book is at least thirty percent better thanks to Grammarly.  The sentences flow better, and the story construction is smoother.

Grammarly is not a replacement for writing ability, but it is an excellent accelerator.

Does Grammarly Make Mistakes?

Grammarly makes mistakes

Yes.  Sometimes I use an expression that Grammarly is unfamiliar with.  Earlier this week I used the phrase “The Law of Effection” on this very blog.  Grammarly tried to convince me that I meant “affection.”  This makes sense because ninety-nine percent of the time affection would be the right word.  This is why you have to work with Grammarly, rather than just assume that every suggestion is correct.

Grammarly is a powerful tool but you cannot simply turn off your mind when you use it.  The mistakes are minor and the software is regularly updated.  The affection suggestion no longer appears when I check that phrase in Grammarly; the database changed in the past few days.

Sometimes Grammarly will get caught in a “suggestion loop.”  It recently got caught telling me to change “cellphone” to “cell phone” and back.  This is a small thing that you can easily overlook and will occur less and less as the software improves.

Here is another example from later in this blog post.  In this case, Grammarly wants me to use the plural of editing.  If you read the sentence, you may agree with me that the singular makes more sense.  Even if it turns out that I'm “technically” wrong, most people would expect the singular and assume that using the word “editings” was a mistake.  Perception is just as important as perfection, and I would rather keep the people who read my books and blog posts happy.

does grammarly make mistakes

You Must Be Online

The biggest annoyance with Grammarly is that it does not work if you are offline.  It's a tool that requires an Internet connection to even activate.  If you're wi-fi drops for even a second, Grammarly will freeze.  With the Mac version of the software, I have to close and restart every time this happens.  The reconnect button never works for me.

Grammarly must be online

It'd be useful if the software could leave a remote version of itself on my computer so that I could be unshackled from the Internet while I'm working.

I realize that forcing the Internet connection is how the system learns.  Every day millions of people use Grammarly and the software is always learning and adapting.  This form of machine learning is currently benevolent; it is only focused on improving its understanding of the English language.  In the future, the software may become self-aware.  Hopefully, the people behind Grammarly are watching for just such an event and will disconnect Grammarly before it becomes SkyNet.

I think we can all agree that nobody wants sentient spellcheck.

Grammarly Bonus Tip – Check Your Workers

This week I met a new writer who was interested in ghostwriting for me.  I currently have so much work on my plate that I'm desperately looking for more writers to bring onto the team to help me out.  She has excellent qualifications and has written thousands of articles and blog posts for other clients.  I asked her to send over a sample of her writing, and if everything was ok, I would give her work immediately.

I immediately uploaded her document into Grammarly.

review grammarly mistakes

Grammarly caught over 160 mistakes that would have taken me hours to find on my own.  The problem is not that she's making these kinds of mistakes; it's that she's not editing her work to catch them before sending it to me.

Now that I use Grammarly as part of my process flow, it has become indispensable.

If you are paying article writers, blog posters or other ghost writers you should run their work through Grammarly before releasing their content on your sites.  In the future, I will be training my writers to use this software to tighten up their work before they send me anything.

Grammarly Bonus Tip – Dealing with Plagiarism

I'm not entirely certain how the Grammarly plagiarism algorithm works.  As far as I can tell, the software scans the Internet for matching words, but I have yet to see an indication that it checks published works such as magazine articles, books and other “offline” content.  You may need something more serious if you are worried about plagiarism from a worker.

Here is a simple test run on three paragraphs of text from The Millionaire Fastlane:

plagiarism check grammarly

As you can see, Grammarly wants to make a few changes to the actual text.  Ignore that for now and focus on the yellow line.  Grammarly underlines stolen content in yellow. It has done a good job of catching that there is plagiarism on the page, but there is a problem.  The entire document is stolen.  I copied and pasted these three paragraphs from the book.

Now we want to see just how useful the plagiarism detector is.

Millionaire Fastlane Plagiarism Test with Grammarly

When you click for more information, Grammarly helpfully provides the correct reference.  This would have been amazing back when I was in college working on term papers.  Unfortunately, it appears that the only reason Grammarly caught this plagiarism is that the author includes the same story in his “about me” page on his website.

When I test other parts of the book that are not on his website, Grammarly doesn't catch them.

Grammarly is not a replacement for CopyScape yet, but it's getting pretty good.  I expect that in the near future Grammarly will add published text to its database and start catching these types of errors as well.  For now, the software is perfect for catching that outsourcer who sends you a blog post that they already sold to someone else or even stole directly from another website.

This powerful bonus tool will detect most traditional plagiarism by writers you might hire and can save you from legal hassles down the line.  This is a good way to protect yourself from paying for stolen content.

Grammarly Bonus Tool – Vocabulary Enhancement

GrammarlyVocabularyEnhancement

Unless you are writing for an audience, you may want to turn this tool off.  Sometimes Grammarly is very contentious and will keep suggesting that I change a word, even though my choice was intentional.  This tool is the most annoying but also the most powerful.  It suggests alternatives and synonyms to words that you use too frequently.  A current weakness of Grammarly is that it can only handle about ten thousand words at once, so you can't upload an entire book.

Scanning one section at a time leads Grammarly to tell you to remove a word from one chapter and then use that same word all the time in the next one.  It doesn't track your word usage from section to section.  This looks like it will change over time, but for now, some of the recommendations are silly.

There are certain words that Grammarly hates, such as “own” and “really.”  You can expect Grammarly to chop those out of everything you write ninety percent of the time you need to remove them. However, occasionally you want to keep one of those words for emphasis.

This is where Grammarly shines.  Many other tools out there offer to help correct spelling and grammar mistakes, but Grammarly goes the extra mile and helps you become a better writer.  As someone who has written multiple bestsellers, I can honestly say that Grammarly has improved the quality of my writing.

How Does Grammarly Work?

Web Interface

There are currently several Grammarly tools, with more expected in the near future.  The most common tool is simply the website.  You copy and paste in your text and then wait a few moments while the Grammarly engine scans your document.  You correct all the changes you desire from the list of recommendations, often with the click of a mouse.  Once you are satisfied with your corrections, you copy and paste from Grammarly back to your preferred word processor.

Grammarly maintains much of the original formatting, but advanced changes will be lost.  If you have parts of your document bolded or centered, that will get lost when you copy and paste.  This may be a problem with the notepad rather than Grammarly, but it can be annoying.  It's much better to finish all of your editing before you start formatting your document.

You can also upload documents in Word format as long as they are small enough to handle.  All of my work is too long for Grammarly, so I copy and paste piece by piece.

Standalone

GrammarlyMacApp

My preferred way to use Grammarly is the stand alone application.  This application only works when you are connected to the Internet, but I prefer it to using a web-based interface.  I have already run nearly 200,000 words through the Grammarly app, and I'm consistently pleased with the results.  Like the web version, this one can only handle documents of moderate size.

I copy and paste my work into Grammarly section by section.  This works well for me as that is how I write in Scrivener anyways.  I write one section at a time, so it makes sense to edit in the same manner.

I do find it strange that the program cannot work locally and update from the central Grammarly server whenever I am next online.  This may be how they protect their software from being stolen, but I am hopeful that eventually, they will release a version I can host on my machine.

I did run into an issue last week where the Grammarly app told me that several chapters in a row had zero mistakes.  I was instantly suspicious and double-checked my chapters using the web interface.  Suddenly, a dozen errors popped up.

There was some type of communication error between the software and the Grammarly server.  Fortunately, the website didn't have this problem, and I was able to continue working.  A few hours later, I rechecked the same chapters in the Grammarly app, and it was working perfectly again.  I do wish the software had notified me of this communication error rather than giving me a false positive.

For a moment I was so proud that I'd finally written an error-free chapter that met Grammarly's high standards.  When the second section also seemed perfect, I became suspicious.

You do have to be active when using Grammarly.  It is not a replacement for active thought or a human editor.  It is an advisor and a supplement to point out areas and words that you might want to change.

Chrome/Firefox Plugin

grammarly chrome plugin

The plugin is pretty great, and I use it to help me with every blog post that I write.  You better believe that I am scanning with Grammarly while I write this.  Grammarly will catch a lot of errors in real time and underline them in red.

You can make your edits inline like in this image:

grammarly chrome plugin

Here you can see that I messed up two words while writing.  These are silly little mistakes that you don't want to let pass you by.  These corrections don't always show up while I'm editing within my WordPress interface.  It has something to do with how often I save my draft and the length of the blog post.  You may have noticed that this one is especially long.  To change the word I just click on the green word that is spelled correctly.  It's very fast.

For advanced changes, you have to click a little red circle at the bottom of the blog post.  This circle pulls up the Grammarly interface in a light box that hovers over the current page.  Some of the errors Grammarly catches can only be corrected with the lightbox.  For example, Grammarly does NOT like that I said “let pass you by” in the first sentence of the previous paragraph.

is grammarly worth it

This error can only be fixed in the Grammarly lightbox.  I have to click on the red “correct with Grammarly” button.  I believe this is more of a limitation of the WordPress interface than the plugin.  Grammarly wants to explain to me in detail why they want me to change that sentence.  Grammarly wants to keep me in the loop on this decision.

grammarly spell check

In this case, I'm not sure that I agree with Grammarly's assessment, so I will leave the sentence the way I wrote it. Grammarly is not intended to replace my brain, only to be a supplement and advisor.

Whether you edit along the way or not, you want to run a final check of a blog post or article before launching it into the universe.  Use the lightbox interface before you click “publish” on your blog post.  Not every mistake shows up in the inline editor.

Word Plugin

There is not a Grammarly plugin for Word.  This only works on PC right now, and Mac users like me will have to wait a little while longer.  The plugin is still in its infancy, so I expect some growing pains.  For now, I would recommend using the dedicated Grammarly interface for the final check of any document you work on.

I don't use Word very much, so this plugin isn't relevant to my workflow yet.  Once the Mac version comes out, I will install it and update this review.

I am more interested in a Scrivener plugin or integration.  When they develop that, Grammarly will finally knock off the last of my socks.

I Read Some Negative Grammarly Reviews

I have noticed that there are a few pretty strong negative reviews about Grammarly online right now.  I took the time to look at the people leaving those reviews.  Most of them are either British or professional editors who fear that Grammarly is seeking to replace them.  Their fear reminds me of the first time I showed a drum machine to my roommate who was a professional drummer.  The thought that I could replace him with a little machine did not put a smile on his face.

It's worth noting that he is still making a fine living touring the world playing the drums, and there are no out of work drummers sitting on the side of the road holding up “will drum for food signs.”

Will Grammarly Turn into Skynet

Grammarly will soon put him out on the street.

Are You English or Canadian?

Right now Grammarly is set to American English.   I found many complaints from British and Canadian reviewers who failed to notice that Grammarly doesn't respect their spelling system right now.  Their “language” will surely be added as the software improves.  Currently, there is no option to choose your language or dialect within the Grammarly interface.

If you are British or a Canadian who prefers colour to color, then you might find Grammarly lacking in its current iteration.

Can it replace an editor?

There are also some pretty harsh reviews from “grammar professionals” and professional book editors.  These reviews have the taint of desperation to them as the reviewers are clearly afraid that the software is designed to replace them.  Like the imaginary homeless drummer, their fears are unjustified and their reviews unreliable.  They fail to grasp that Grammarly is not a replacement for the human mind.  They have nothing to fear.

This is a tool for writers, not editors, so their reviews are irrelevant.  Do you care if a professional swimmer posts a negative review about a pair of sneakers?  You want to follow reviews by people who will use the software like you do.  If you are a professional writer, blogger, article writer or ghost writer then hopefully you connected with my review as this is how I make my living.

This tool is not intended to replace editors; they have nothing to fear.  The software is a long way from developing sentience, so their jobs are secure for a little longer.

Grammarly Bonus – Advanced Techniques

I just used Grammarly to help me with a unique project.  I had a script written in Word that I needed to transfer to PowerPoint.  I needed to put one sentence on each slide.  When copying directly, I had to keep scraping the formatting so that the text would be in the correct PowerPoint font and size.  It was annoying to constantly copy and paste this way.  I copied the document into Grammarly and from there into PowerPoint one line at a time.

It cut off about 70% of the time from the little project.  Grammarly defaults to the formatting of whatever document you are pasting into.  This is how you can edit something and paste it back into the document, and most (but not all) of the formatting remains the same.  Anything universal will still be there, but changes to individual sentences or phrases will be lost.  Words that were bold will lose that effect when you use Grammarly.

Final Review of Grammarly – Is it Worth the Money?

One of my biggest problems is when I get tired my spelling slips.  My fingers start hitting the wrong key or in the wrong order and these little mistakes can add up.  I don't notice them because I told my fingers the correct spelling.  The mistake is made further down the line in my body, and I'm already thinking of the next words.

Grammarly is great at catching these types of mistakes and increases my workflow efficiency and speed.  Grammarly costs more than $100 a year, and that is no joke to your average consumer.  The free version is more than adequate for many people, but if you generate income from writing, then the upgrade is worth every penny.

Grammarly saves me time.  That alone makes the software a must-buy.  The faster I write the more money I make or time I can spend with my family.  I only add one piece of software to my workflow every year.  Don't expect a glowing review of any other writing tools in the next twelve months.  Very rarely do I find a tool that I'm willing to test, let alone use or write about.  I did recently grab Hemingway on sale, but it's not part of my workflow yet.  I may play with it more in a little while, but for now, Grammarly is meeting my needs.

Grammarly has led to more jobs and more praise for several of my clients and publishers.  They don't know I'm using the tool; they just think my writing suddenly improved.  I'm more than happy to take credit 😉

If you found my Grammarly review useful, please click the link below to grab the free edition.

Get Grammarly for Free HERE.

Jonathan Green
 

Living the dream on a tropical island, Jonathan is the author of Serve No Master and the host of the Serve No Master Podcast.

Click Here to Leave a Comment Below 26 comments
Jody Milliken - October 17, 2016

I’m a professional copywriter. For years, it never bothered me that ‘improper grammar’ was splotched all over my work. It didn’t seem to make a difference. After all, people respond to emotion before they ever decide to buy one of my produces. I was obviously missing something.

A lot of the grammar mistakes in Jonathan Green’s essay wouldn’t bother me in the slightest. I’d also notice repeated uses of words on my own. But it’s also a short text.

This has opened my eyes. As a copywriter, I understand that nobody will read to the end of my ads, unless it’s easy to do so. I’m going to try out Grammarly for free, and see if it increases readership among my audience, the same way that easy-to-read text does. Thanks.

Reply
David Peterson - October 17, 2016

Hm. I wasn’t ever considering this software. The commercials plainly point out the benefits, but I wouldn’t trust myself to write a thesis paper without proper grammar.

On the other hand, if an English Master, foreign language teacher, and professional writer can make mistakes, then maybe I am, too. My major isn’t even close to the same field.

Reply
Cory McNeil - October 17, 2016

Seems easy to use. I thought it was another scam, or cash grab myself. I paid hundreds of dollars for my Word editing software, and it can’t perform as well as Grammarly?

If so, I’ll have to check it out. It could definitely save me some time, stress and effort, let alone pointing out all of the flaws in my writing. The $200 a year seems pretty steep, but I’ll see how it pans out, and if I like it, I might consider purchasing.

Reply
Matt Williams - October 17, 2016

Good review, overall. Covered all of the main bases. I like how you point out the flaws as well as the strengths, so that I don’t have to figure them out the hard way. I suppose I could test it out for myself, but I don’t really notice the mistakes.

For example, the use of the word ‘editings’ wouldn’t have occurred to me. In fact, my spellchecker identifies it as a spelling mistake, and that says a lot. My demographic probably thinks less of my professionalism for it. Either way, I’ve paid more for technology that promised a lot less.

I appreciate your honesty, and will likely recommend Grammarly to some of my writing friends.

Reply
Serena Jones - October 17, 2016

Wow. So, like Jonathan I mostly relied on Microsoft Word for my grammar editing, because it was the only platform that handled it well. Up until this point, Grammarly seemed like something only a university professor would notice the difference with.

I went ahead and started the free trial. Everything in this review is correct. I never have to guess which corrections are being made (as they’re not always obvious). The accuracy issue of looping through possible corrections isn’t hard to deal with. Now, rather than passing my work of to an editor, I mostly get logical and emotional opinions.

It’s 100% dedicated to grammar, and it makes sense.

Reply
Jordan Levy - October 17, 2016

Grammarly has a ton of useful features. For one, it’s important to me to get the perfect wording for each situation, even more so than that the grammar make perfect sense. Many readers won’t know the difference.

But it helps you be precise. Readers love short, sweet and to the point information, and ever since this review, I’ve had access to a tool that won’t allow me to add wasteful words. In short, Jonathan’s exposed me to an inexpensive tool that’s dramatically increased the quality and originality of my writing.

Reply
Amanda LaPearle - October 17, 2016

I love how Grammarly is open to the work of editors. To begin with, it doesn’t limit the imagination of my writers, but also forces them to be more creative with their word choice. It’s a quick go-to for grammar checking and plagiarism testing.

Major con: I’m not always online. At the same time, I agree with Jon, that constantly expanding and learning is part of what makes Grammarly so smart and effective. There are just small annoyances, like restarting when the internet cuts out for a moment, and the character limit. All things considered, it cuts down on the daily grind, though.

I didn’t know the online plugin existed. Auto-spellcheckers on the web can either be annoying or invaluable, and I’m excited to try it out, as well.

Reply
Karen Hope - October 17, 2016

I write for a living. I’m just starting out, and am always learning what makes clients either happy or very angry. I can’t wait to start using Grammarly.

There are some obvious areas, where I know it’ll be helpful. For example, the free version points out how many critical areas I’ve made, and I’m going to see how many I can find on my own. On the other hand, it would be nice to have an easy to use tool that can do it for me.

Staying in present tense seems difficult. Also, as Jordan Levy points out – I didn’t know this – being concise is both powerful, and makes your writing easier to read. I’m definitely purchasing the paid version. There aren’t many reliable tools like this that I know of.

Reply
Kevin Stuart - October 17, 2016

People take for granted how impressive this software is. I’ve done work on language translation programs, and they’re nowhere near as significant as Grammarly, in terms of grammar.

It’s also well designed. I’ve gone pretty in-depth with it since reading this blog post, and everything is laid out clearly in front of you. As it should be, the objections as to why a person wouldn’t want to use Grammarly, or its setbacks are presented in plain view. Like everyone else, I don’t like how you have to copy and paste material piece by piece, especially when writing a technical review.

On the other hand, the functionality is advanced for complicated language. Being able to paste the finished work into an Adobe Acrobat PDF and keep some of the formatting is greatly appreciated as well. Very in-depth review!

Reply
Arnold Morris - December 11, 2016

Loved the review, I think this program is really good for making sure all writing styles come out in their best form.

Reply
Damian Christianson - August 19, 2017

I saw a few typo’s and wondered if you use Grammarly all the time or not?

I think of it as a tool – like a chief buying partial prep food from Sysco/US Foods. That allows him more time to focus on the creative and management of his kitchen. Not how to perfect his chopping skills after 20 years.

“There is nor a Grammarly plugin for Word.”

Thanks for the in-depth analysis.

By the way, I was looking for a way to have track changes work in Word with Grammarly which it cannot do natively. My solution was a little bit of a kludge but better than nothing for some use cases:

– Save the original document.
– Create a new version (I add Grammarly to the end of the file name)
– Run Grammarly add-on in MS Word against the new version
– Save the new version
– Run Compare in MS Word comparing original to Grammarly version labeling new version Grammarly
– Save new comparison to a 3rd file and move on.

Reply
Lucius Lei - December 1, 2017

Thank you for this through review. I have seen Grammarly ads and advertorials for quite some time now and will finally give it a spin. Even if the tool does not work out for me it will at least challenge my writing in various ways, which cannot be a bad thing.

Reply
Nirmal Kumar - December 22, 2017

Thanks for the review on Grammarly. I love using Grammarly. It has helped me publish blog posts free from basic errors.

Reply
Tammy - January 7, 2018

Hi,

I enjoyed reading your article. However, I have a hard time believing that someone as distinguished as yourself would use an ellipsis unnecessarily. It makes me question the validity of this review.

Reply
    Jonathan Green - January 9, 2018

    I have to admit that sometimes I break “grammar rules” for the purposes of style. I don’t want my writing to read like an 1800s textbook. It adds character to my writing 😉

    Reply
Harry Olson - January 10, 2018

I think you meant baking not backing in the sun:)

Reply
Valentina - January 15, 2018

Hey there, I like the spirit of your work and will be checking out any other reviews. However, THIS got away from you, Grammarly AND the other commentators that is sure to be a result of auto-correct:

“However, this product will save you more than **** it’s **** price in time-saved alone during the first month.”

Probably not worth the money then, human eyes would have caught that in a flash 🙂
Also, as you pointed out, sometimes you might wish to write with correct grammar, but not an artificial/sterile style. The added automated checking might be a waste of time, whereas a human might be able to pick up on the style you wish to use and not point out obvious deliberate choices.

I happily use the free version, but I do believe that sum is a little too much.

But thank you for your review!

Reply
    Jonathan Green - January 24, 2018

    The irony is that the theme I use for this blog on fancy reviews doesn’t cooperate with the Grammarly plugin, so it’s tone of the few pages I can’t grammarize.

    And you’re right. For most people the free version is all you need.

    Reply
Paul - April 30, 2018

Re: the following:

“Word Plugin
There is nor a Grammarly plugin for Word.”

Not trying to be snarky, but how did that happen? I’m seriously thinking about the paid plan…

Reply
    Jonathan Green - May 12, 2018

    In a great feat of irony, because I wrote this post using Thrive Architect and it’s so graphical…the Grammarly plugin doesn’t work on this post. Thanks for catching that lil typo for me!

    Reply
Judith Okech - May 10, 2018

I have used Grammarly for a year now and I can’t complain since it has done me more good than harm. I feel relieved having pounced on this article. Nothing is 100% good and not everyone will endorse the software. That is expected even in the writing industry; good comments and annoying comments. Thanks for sharing the tear-down you encountered from one of your reviewers. It has boosted my morale and taught me to face the challenges as they come.

Reply
retsep - June 6, 2018

The mistakes a minor and the software is regularly updated. -> The mistakes are minor and the software is regularly updated.

Reply
Adam - August 22, 2018

Professional editor, composition prof. Thanks for the review. I like Grammarly — let’s get that out of the way. In particular, the ability to switch between styles of writing is valuable, as rules of punctuation and stylistic choices shift by context.

That said, Grammarly still makes too many basic mistakes to be a trustworthy “editor.” For example, it routinely wants me to change infinitives to gerunds when that would be objectively wrong, and in fact, a mistake few of my students would ever make (e.g., “to running”). Far worse is that it misses obvious errors. Why is this worse? Because a capable writer can dismiss erroneous corrections, but if you’re relying on Grammarly to be your eagle eyes, you may end up with errors in your copy.

I still endorse the program because it will flag most issues and does a decent job with stylistic suggestions — better than MS Word’s newer concision checker, anyway. And as the author wrote, it will only get better and updates occur server-side, so instantaneously.

Reply
    Jonathan Green - August 23, 2018

    Hi Adam,

    This is a great reply. You are exactly right. Grammarly isn’t perfect, but it’s the best of the automated options. And I have noticed it continuing to improve since I originally wrote this review.

    Reply

Leave a Reply:

Join the Tribe

Enter your best email below to get your personal invite to the Author and Entrepreneur Accelerator, as well as instant complimentary access to the "Escape the 9-5 Bootcamp"
Let Me In

Join the Community
close-link

Couldn't Find the Link in the Book?

Enter Your Best Email Address Below to Get Your Copy of Breaking Orbit Phase Two: Audiobooks
DOWNLOAD NOW
close-link
Trying to Make a Living Online?
Discover The Seven Reasons You Can't Finish Your Product. 
Enter your best email below to learn how to overcome these barriers TODAY.
Tell Me More!
No Thanks!
close-link